Ethical issues in HIV/STD prevention research with high risk youth: Providing help, preserving validity
Ethics and Behavior 18 (2 & 3):247 – 265 (2008)
| Abstract | Many preventive intervention studies with adolescents address high-risk behaviors such as drug and alcohol use, and unprotected sex. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are the gold standard methodology used to test the effectiveness of these behavioral interventions. Interventions outside the rigidly described protocol are prohibited. However, there are ethical challenges to implementing inflexible intervention protocols, especially when the target population is young, experiences many stressful events, and lives in a resource-poor environment. Teens who are at high risk for substance use or sexual risk behaviors tend to be at risk for other problems such as exposure to violence, sexual and physical abuse, depression, and homelessness. How should investigators deal with the psychological and social needs of teenagers in prevention programs in an ethically appropriate way and at the same time preserve the validity of RCT results? We have identified program characteristics, participant characteristics, interaction with parents, and problems with adolescents not in the study as sources of ethical dilemmas in RCT with at-risk adolescents. As a result of our experience, we recommend that every behavioral intervention study develop an ethics protocol, which should include rules for providing help to participants, has contact information for experts to provide guidance, and an emergency procedure for dealing with life threatening situations. In addition, studies should have a resource manual, train research staff in these ethical issues, and work with a data safety and monitoring board or ethics committee. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesN. Athanassoulis & A. Ross (2010). A Virtue Ethical Account of Making Decisions About Risk. Journal of Risk Research 13 (2):217.
Christine Grady (1994). Hiv Preventive Vaccine Research: Selected Ethical Issues. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (6):595-612.
R. Macklin (2010). Intertwining Biomedical Research and Public Health in HIV Microbicide Research. Public Health Ethics 3 (3):199-209.
E. J. Brown & E. M. Simpson (2000). Comprehensive STD/HIV Prevention Education Targeting US Adolescents: Review of an Ethical Dilemma and Proposed Ethical Framework. [REVIEW] Nursing Ethics 7 (4):339-349.
Elyn R. Saks, Dilip V. Jeste, Eric Granholm, Barton W. Palmer & Lawrence Schneiderman (2002). Ethical Issues in Psychosocial Interventions Research Involving Controls. Ethics and Behavior 12 (1):87 – 101.
Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray (2011). Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):5 - 13.
Celia B. Fisher & Scyatta A. Wallace (2000). Through the Community Looking Glass: Reevaluating the Ethical and Policy Implications of Research on Adolescent Risk and Psychopathology. Ethics and Behavior 10 (2):99 – 118.
Keymanthri Moodley (2007). Microbicide Research in Developing Countries: Have We Given the Ethical Concerns Due Consideration? BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-7.
Celia B. Fisher (1994). Reporting and Referring Research Participants: Ethical Challenges for Investigators Studying Children and Youth. Ethics and Behavior 4 (2):87 – 95.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #123,092 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
