In defense of a principal theorem
Synthese 20 (1):121 - 142 (1969)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSuzanne Uniacke (2011). Proportionality and Self-Defense. Law and Philosophy 30 (3):253-272.
James Turner Johnson (2008). The Idea of Defense in Historical and Contemporary Thinking About Just War. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):543-556.
Stephen G. Simpson (1984). Which Set Existence Axioms Are Needed to Prove the Cauchy/Peano Theorem for Ordinary Differential Equations? Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (3):783-802.
Victor Harnik & Michael Makkai (1976). Applications of Vaught Sentences and the Covering Theorem. Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (1):171-187.
Michael Detlefsen (2001). What Does Gödel's Second Theorem Say. Philosophia Mathematica 9 (1).
W. H. Baumer (1963). Von Wright's Paradoxes. Philosophy of Science 30 (2):165-172.
Sachio Hirokawa (1992). The Converse Principal Type-Scheme Theorem in Lambda Calculus. Studia Logica 51 (1):83 - 95.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,204 of 548,983 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
