Kant, Lonergan, and Fichte on the Critique of Immediacy and the Epistemology of Constraint in Human Knowing
Graduate studies at Western
International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):91-112 (2003)
|Abstract||One of the defining characteristics of Kant’s “critical philosophy” is what has been called the “critique of immediacy” or the rejection of the “myth of the given.” According to the Kantian position, no object can count as an object for a human knower apart from the knower’s own activity or spontaneity. That is, no object can count as an object for a human knower on the basis of the object’s givenness alone. But this gives rise to a problem: how is it possible to accept the Kantian critique of immediacy while also giving an epistemologically adequate account of the constrained or finite character of human knowing (i.e., an account that does not rely on some appeal to what is simply “given”)? This paper examines how this crucial question is addressed (with more or less success) in the “critical philosophies” of Kant, Lonergan, and Fichte|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Kelley (1997). Intuition and Immediacy in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:289-298.
Garth W. Green (2007). Fichte's Critique of Kant's Doctrine of Inner Sense. Idealistic Studies 37 (3):157-178.
Roland Teske (1990). Bradley and Lonergan's Relativist. Philosophy and Theology 5 (2):125-136.
Vasilis Politis (1997). The Apriority of the Starting-Point of Kant's Transcendental Epistemology. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):255 – 284.
Cyril Orji (2013). Using 'Foundation'as Inculturation Hermeneutic in a World Church: Did Rahner Validate Lonergan? Heythrop Journal 54 (2):287-300.
Greg P. Hodes (2002). Intentional Structure and the Identity Theory of Knowledge in Bernard Lonergan. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (4):437-452.
J. Steigerwald (2003). The Dynamics of Reason and its Elusive Object in Kant, Fichte and Schelling. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):111-134.
Jaakko Hintikka (1972). III. Kantian Intuitions. Inquiry 15 (1-4):341 – 345.
Patrick R. Frierson (2005). Kant's Empirical Account of Human Action. Philosophers' Imprint 5 (7):1-34.
Frederick Neuhouser (1990). Fichte's Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge University Press.
Robert R. Williams (2006). Hegel's Critique of Kant. Owl of Minerva 38 (1/2):9-34.
Jacob J. Ross (1970). The Appeal To The Given: A Study In Epistemology. London,: Allen &Amp; Unwin.
Peter Graham Thielke (2010). Who's Who From Kant to Hegel I: In the Kantian Wake. Philosophy Compass 5 (5):385-397.
Benjamin D. Crowe (2010). Fichte's Transcendental Theology. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 92 (1):68-88.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads10 ( #114,394 of 722,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?