Law and Philosophy 19 (2):247-262 (2000)
|Abstract||From a sociological point of view, the conceptual and logical relations between the norms of legal order represent empirical and causal relations between social actors. The claim that legal authority is based on the validity of empowering norms means, sociologically, that the capability to enact and enforce legal norms is based on an empirical transfer of power from one social actor to another. With this process, sociology has to explain how a proclamation of legal rights by the creation of empowering norms can lead to the establishment of the factual power of coercion. This explanation reveals that legal authority as a social fact is irrevocably dependent on non-legal power, which is not created by legal empowering norms but is the empirical foundation for all legal authority and state power.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Brian Bix (2006). Legal Positivism and 'Explaining' Normativity and Authority. American Philosophical Association Newsletter 5 (2 (Spring 2006)):5-9.
Jennifer Hendry & Daniel Augenstein, The 'Fertile Dilemma of Law': Legal Integration and Legal Cultures in the European Union.
Dick W. P. Ruiter (1997). Legal Validity Qua Specific Mode of Existence. Law and Philosophy 16 (5):479 - 505.
P. W. (1997). Legal Validity Qua Specific Mode of Existence. Law and Philosophy 16 (5):479-505.
C. Heidemann (2000). The Creation of Normative Facts. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):263-281.
U. Schmill (2000). The Dynamic Order of Norms, Empowerment and Related Concepts. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):283-310.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #24,555 of 549,128 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )
How can I increase my downloads?