The Monoamine Oxidase A (MAOA) Genetic Predisposition to Impulsive Violence: Is It Relevant to Criminal Trials?
Graduate studies at Western
Neuroethics 6 (2):287-306 (2013)
|Abstract||In Italy, a judge reduced the sentence of a defendant by 1 year in response to evidence for a genetic predisposition to violence. The best characterized of these genetic differences, those in the monoamine oxidase A (MAOA), were cited as especially relevant. Several months previously in the USA, MAOA data contributed to a jury reducing charges from 1st degree murder (a capital offence) to voluntary manslaughter. Is there a rational basis for this type of use of MAOA evidence in criminal court? This paper will review in context recent work on the MAOA gene–environment interaction in predisposing individuals to violence and address the relevance of such findings to murder trials. Interestingly, the MAOA genetic variants impact future violence and aggression only when combined with the adverse environmental stimuli of childhood maltreatment. Thus nature and nurture interact to determine the individual’s risk. Based on current evidence, I argue there is a weak case for mitigation. But should future experiments confirm the hypothesis that individual differences in impulse control and response to provocation found in MAOA-L men (without abuse) are significantly magnified when combined with childhood maltreatment, the case could turn into a stronger one|
|Keywords||Violence Genetic predisposition MAOA Monoamine Oxidase A Criminal responsibility Neuroethics Gene × environment interaction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mairi Levitt, Genes, Environment and Responsibility for Violent Behaviour:'Whatever Genes One has It is Preferable That You Are Prevented From Going Around Stabbing People'.
James Tabery (2009). From a Genetic Predisposition to an Interactive Predisposition: Rethinking the Ethical Implications of Screening for Gene-Environment Interactions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (1):27-48.
Laurence Perbal (2013). The 'Warrior Gene' and the Mãori People: The Responsibility of the Geneticists. Bioethics 27 (7):382-387.
Richard J. Davidson, Dysfunction in the Neural Circuitry of Emotion Regulation—A Possible Prelude to Violence.
Stephen C. Maxson (1999). Some Reflections on Sex Differences in Aggression and Violence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):232-233.
James Tabery (2009). Interactive Predispositions. Philosophy of Science 76 (5).
Patricia S. Greenspan (2001). Genes, Electrotransmitters, and Free Will. In Patricia S. Greenspan, David Wasserman & Robert Wachbroit (eds.), Genetics and Criminal Behavior: Methods, Meanings, and Morals. Cambridge University Press.
R. G. Apressyan (2009). The Ethics of Force: Against Aggression and Violence. Diogenes 56 (2-3):95-109.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2008). Media Violence and Freedom of Speech: How to Use Empirical Data. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (5):493-505.
M. Farisco & C. Petrini (2012). The Impact of Neuroscience and Genetics on the Law: A Recent Italian Case. Neuroethics 5 (3):317-319.
Alan Strudler (1994). The Social Construction of Genetic Abnormality: Ethical Implications for Managerial Decisions in the Workplace. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (11):839 - 848.
Mairi Levitt & Elisa Pieri, 'It Could Just Be an Additional Test Couldn't It?':Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Aggression and Violence.
Stathis N. Kalyvas (2004). The Paradox of Terrorism in Civil War. Journal of Ethics 8 (1):97-138.
Added to index2011-05-07
Total downloads45 ( #28,948 of 727,097 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 727,097 )
How can I increase my downloads?