David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kriterion 50 (119):63-92 (2009)
New settings for communication are being built, having, at one side, great corporations of television, radio, press and on line media, and at the other side the role of the independent / alternative press, understood as not bound to a private, public or state enterprise or to some economic group. It takes gradually shape the constitution of the opposition between the traditional media and the independent / alternative press, having as a material base the new technologies of information. How can the new technology of information associated to the new settings of press freedom and the phenomenon of the contradiction of public opinion in the era of internet accomplish the mediation of the opinion in a globalized society? Or still, starting from the presupposition of the press freedom, how to guarantee that the society solves the contradiction of the public opinion? The phenomenon of the public opinion is contradicting because it has in itself, at the same time, the universality of constitutional principles of Law and Ethics, together with the peculiarity of the citizens’ rights and concerns. This contradiction finds its solution by means of the mediation of the freedom of the press itself within a frame of democratic legality. This is the power of the contradiction: to put into effect the dialectic tension between the opposed poles of the universal and the particular in the press freedom, avowing the right of every citizen to express publicly his opinion. This is Hegel’s theory of public opinion: the press freedom and the parliament, as a politic space, are privileged spheres of the mediation of the contradictory phenomenon of the public opinion. Keywords: Press freedom; public opinion; press; citizen journalists.
|Keywords||Press freedom public opinion press citizen journalists.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Brian Richardson (2004). The Public's Right to Know: A Dangerous Notion. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (1):46 – 55.
Candace Cummins Gauthier (1999). Right to Know, Press Freedom, Public Discourse. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 14 (4):197-212.
Candace Cummins Gauthier (1999). Right to Know, Press Freedom, Public Discourse. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 14 (4):197 – 212.
Eric R. A. N. Smith (1996). What is Public Opinion? Critical Review 10 (1):95-105.
Theodore L. Glasser & Stephanie Craft (1996). Public Journalism and the Prospects for Press Accountability. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 11 (3):152 – 158.
R. Murray Thomas (1993). What Wrongdoers Deserve: The Moral Reasoning Behind Responses to Misconduct. Greenwood Press.
James Mensch (2007). Public Space. Continental Philosophy Review 40 (1):31-47.
David Gordon & John C. Merrill (1988). Power — the Key to Press Freedom: A Four-Tiered Social Model. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 3 (1):38 – 49.
María G. Navarro (2011). Los Papeles Periódicos y El Espacio Público. En Torno a la Legitimidad de Las Funciones Cognitivas Del Espacio Público. Praxis Filosófica 33:227-242.
Slavko Splichal (2003). Bentham, Kant, and the Right to Communicate. Critical Review 15 (3-4):285-305.
Muhammad Ali Khalidi (2009). The Arab Street: Tracking a Political Metaphor. Middle East Journal 63 (1):11-29.
Robert Y. Shapiro (1998). Public Opinion, Elites, and Democracy. Critical Review 12 (4):501-528.
Lynn M. Sanders (1999). Democratic Politics and Survey Research. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):248-280.
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads4 ( #258,599 of 1,102,818 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #182,775 of 1,102,818 )
How can I increase my downloads?