David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):307-330 (1997)
Berkeley and Hume object to Locke's account of abstraction. Abstraction is separating in the mind what cannot be separated in reality. Their objection is that if a is inseparable in reality from b, then the idea of a is inseparable from the idea of b. The former inseparability is the reason for the latter. In most interpretations, however, commentators leave the former unexplained in explaining the latter. This article assumes that Berkeley and Hume present a unified front against Locke. Hume supplements Berkeley's argument just where there are gaps. In particular, Hume makes explicit something Berkeley leaves implicit: The argument against Locke depends on the principle that things are inseparable if and only if they are identical. Abstraction is thinking of one of an inseparable pair while not thinking of the other. But doing so entails thinking of something while not thinking of it. This is the fundamental objection
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rafal Urbaniak (2010). Neologicist nominalism. Studia Logica 96 (2):149-173.
R. D. Rollinger (1993). Meinong and Husserl on Abstraction and Universals: From Hume Studies I to Logical Investigations Ii. Rodopi.
Cynthia A. Stark (2010). Abstraction and Justification in Moral Theory. Hypatia 25 (4):825-833.
Stewart Shapiro (2004). The Nature and Limits of Abstraction. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):166 - 174.
D. E. Bradshaw (1988). Berkeley and Hume on Abstraction and Generalization. History of Philosophy Quarterly 5 (1):11 - 22.
D. J. Saab & U. V. Riss (eds.) (2010). Logic and Abstraction as Capabilities of the Mind: Reconceptualizations of Computational Approaches to the Mind. IGI.
Walter R. Ott (2004). The Cartesian Context of Berkeley's Attack on Abstraction. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):407–424.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #73,239 of 1,168,025 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,420 of 1,168,025 )
How can I increase my downloads?