Character, purpose, and criminal responsibility
Law and Philosophy 1 (1):5 - 20 (1982)
| Abstract | This paper explores analyzing criminal responsibility from the Humean position that blame is for character traits. If untoward acts indicate undesirable character traits, then the agent is blameworthy; if they do not, then the actor is not blameworthy — he has an excuse. A distinctive feature of this approach is that that voluntariness of acts is irrelevant to determining blameworthiness.This analysis is then applied to a variety of issues in criminal law. Mens supports inferences to character traits, and the Humean approach provides a reason for rejeting strict criminal liability. The Humean approach also helps resolve a number of issues about attempts, such as punishment for impossible attempts and the defense of abandonment. It also supports the broad outlines of the defense of mistake and provides a third alternative in the Wooton-Hart debate over punishment and treatment. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCandace L. Upton (2009). The Structure of Character. Journal of Ethics 13 (2-3):175 - 193.
C. T. Sistare (1988). Models of Responsibility in Criminal Theory: Comment on Baker. Law and Philosophy 7 (3):295 - 320.
Nicola Lacey (2007). Space, Time and Function: Intersecting Principles of Responsibility Across the Terrain of Criminal Justice. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (3):233-250.
Luigi Ferrajoli & Danilo Zolo (1985). Marxism and the Criminal Question. Law and Philosophy 4 (1):71 - 99.
Douglas N. Husak (2010). The Philosophy of Criminal Law: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
Nicole A. Vincent (2010). On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Vincent Chiao (2009). Intention and Attempt. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):37-55.
Katrina Sifferd (2012). Changing the Criminal Character: Nanotechnology and Criminal Punishment. In A. Santosuosso (ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 Law and Science Young Scholars Symposium. Pavia University Press.
Antony Duff (2009). Legal and Moral Responsibility. Philosophy Compass 4 (6):978-986.
Mohamad Al-Hakim (2010). Making Room for Hate Crime Legislation in Liberal Societies. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):341-358.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads35 ( #34,173 of 549,128 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,128 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
