Graduate studies at Western
Law and Philosophy 1 (1):5 - 20 (1982)
|Abstract||This paper explores analyzing criminal responsibility from the Humean position that blame is for character traits. If untoward acts indicate undesirable character traits, then the agent is blameworthy; if they do not, then the actor is not blameworthy — he has an excuse. A distinctive feature of this approach is that that voluntariness of acts is irrelevant to determining blameworthiness.This analysis is then applied to a variety of issues in criminal law. Mens supports inferences to character traits, and the Humean approach provides a reason for rejeting strict criminal liability. The Humean approach also helps resolve a number of issues about attempts, such as punishment for impossible attempts and the defense of abandonment. It also supports the broad outlines of the defense of mistake and provides a third alternative in the Wooton-Hart debate over punishment and treatment.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Candace L. Upton (2009). The Structure of Character. Journal of Ethics 13 (2-3):175 - 193.
Antony Duff (2009). Legal and Moral Responsibility. Philosophy Compass 4 (6):978-986.
Katrina Sifferd (2012). Changing the Criminal Character: Nanotechnology and Criminal Punishment. In A. Santosuosso (ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 Law and Science Young Scholars Symposium. Pavia University Press.
Vincent Chiao (2009). Intention and Attempt. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):37-55.
Nicole A. Vincent (2010). On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Douglas N. Husak (2010). The Philosophy of Criminal Law: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
Luigi Ferrajoli & Danilo Zolo (1985). Marxism and the Criminal Question. Law and Philosophy 4 (1):71 - 99.
Nicola Lacey (2007). Space, Time and Function: Intersecting Principles of Responsibility Across the Terrain of Criminal Justice. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (3):233-250.
C. T. Sistare (1988). Models of Responsibility in Criminal Theory: Comment on Baker. Law and Philosophy 7 (3):295 - 320.
Mohamad Al-Hakim (2010). Making Room for Hate Crime Legislation in Liberal Societies. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):341-358.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #39,306 of 739,578 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,578 )
How can I increase my downloads?