Graduate studies at Western
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):415-421 (2000)
|Abstract||You’ll be pleased to know that I don’t intend to use these remarks to comment on all of the papers presented at this conference. I won’t try to show that one paper was right about this topic, that another was wrong was about that topic, or that several of our conference participants were talking past one another. Nor will I try to adjudicate any of the discussions which took place in between our sessions. Instead, I’ll use these remarks to make two simple points: one about logicism in the 20th century and one about neo-logicism here at the start of the 21st.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sanford Shieh (2008). Frege on Definitions. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):992-1012.
Jaime Nubiola (1996). C. S. Peirce: Pragmatism and Logicism. Philosophia Scientiae 1 (2):109-119.
Bird Alexander (1997). The Logic in Logicism. Dialogue 36:341–60.
Otavio Bueno (2001). Logicism Revisited. Principia 5 (1-2):99-124.
Richard Jeffrey (2002). Logicism Lite. Philosophy of Science 69 (3):474-496.
Ian Proops (2006). Russell’s Reasons for Logicism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):267-292.
Marcus Rossberg & Philip A. Ebert (2007). What is the Purpose of Neo-Logicism? Traveaux de Logique 18:33-61.
José Ferreiros (1997). Notes on Types, Sets, and Logicism, 1930-1950. Theoria 12 (1):91-124.
Philip A. Ebert & Marcus Rossberg (2009). Ed Zalta's Version of Neo-Logicism: A Friendly Letter of Complaint. In Hannes Leitgeb & Alexander Hieke (eds.), Reduction – Abstraction – Analysis. Ontos.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,476 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?