Philosophical Review 116 (3):401-425 (2007)
|Abstract||In his new paper, “Eligibility and Inscrutability,” J. R. G. Williams presents a surprising new challenge to David Lewis’ theory of interpretation. Although Williams frames this challenge primarily as a response to Lewis’ criticisms of Putnam’s model-theoretic argument, the challenge itself goes to the heart of Lewis’ own account of interpretation. Further, and leaving Lewis’ project aside for a moment, Williams’ argument highlights some important—and some fairly general—points concerning the relationship between model theory and semantic determinacy.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bas C. van Fraassen (1997). Putnam's Paradox: Metaphysical Realism Revamped and Evaded. Philosophical Perspectives 11:17-42.
Sungho Choi (2005). Understanding the Influence Theory of Causation: A Critique of Strevens. Erkenntnis 63 (1):101 - 118.
Hywel David Lewis (1978). Persons and Life After Death: Essays. Barnes & Noble.
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1997). Elgin on Lewis's Putnam's Paradox. Journal of Philosophy 94 (2):85-93.
Timothy Bays (2007). The Problem with Charlie: Some Remarks on Putnam, Lewis, and Williams. Philosophical Review 116 (3):401-425.
Robert Williams (2006). An Argument for the Many. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1):411-419.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #83,183 of 549,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,790 of 549,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?