David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Semantics 28 (1):1-54 (2011)
In this article I examine ditransitive verbs that can describe caused possession (e.g. give, throw, send) by looking at their lexical aspectual properties, a methodology that has proved fruitful for the exploration of (in)transitive verbs. I show that as a whole these ditransitives share a number of aspectual properties in common with (in)transitive verbs of change of state and motion, suggesting a single shared underlying analysis, which I outline in terms of the scalar analysis of change of Beavers (forthcoming b). However, a difficulty of such an analysis is that for many ditransitives, the putative result state (caused possession) is cancellable, which complicates how factors such as telicity are calculated on most models of aspect. To account for this, I show that all ditransitives nonetheless entail at least some non-cancellable result, though there is considerable micro-variation in what that result is. The result is an aspectually based classification of ditransitives quite similar to previously proposed classes of (in)transitives. I also show that the analysis I develop may shed some light on why certain classes of ditransitives only rarely participate in the dative alternation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jean-Pierre Koenig & Anthony R. Davis (2001). Sublexical Modality and the Structure of Lexical Semantic Representations. Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (1):71-124.
Citations of this work BETA
Yael Sharvit (2013). On the Universal Principles of Tense Embedding: The Lesson From Before. Journal of Semantics:ffs024.
Similar books and articles
Anna Szabolcsi (2011). Certain Verbs Are Syntactically Explicit Quantifiers. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6 (1):5.
Maria Bittner (2008). Aspectual Universals of Temporal Anaphora. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect. John Benjamins. 11--349.
Jan Voorst (1992). The Aspectual Semantics of Psychological Verbs. Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (1):65 - 92.
Takashi Yagisawa (2001). Partee Verbs. Philosophical Studies 103 (3):253 - 270.
Hans Smessaert & Alice G. B. Ter Meulen (2004). Temporal Reasoning with Aspectual Adverbs. Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (2):209-261.
Paul Egré (2008). Question-Embedding and Factivity. Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):85-125.
Steven Pinker (1987). Productivity and Constraints in the Acquisition of the Passive. Cognition 26 (3):195-267.
Anna Papafragou (1998). The Acquisition of Modality: Implications for Theories of Semantic Representation. Mind and Language 13 (3):370–399.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads10 ( #148,407 of 1,102,796 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,523 of 1,102,796 )
How can I increase my downloads?