David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Idealistic Studies 35 (1):61-72 (2005)
The paper considers what united and divided Benjamin and Horkheimer-Adorno in terms of their respective confrontations with the question of what it is to articulate the past historically. It presents their shared self-consciousness of the difficult task of responding critically to a problem conceived of as the entanglement of the concept of history with domination. For the problem imbues conceptualization itself and therefore threatens the value of the authoritative statements made in their own critical reflection on it. I show that these thinkers necessarily respond to the problem in confrontation with specific historical contexts: fascism, Soviet communism, German social democracy, and liberal democracy. The challenge they face is how to metabolize thinking in the midst of tendencies that disable it. I compare Benjamin’s solution, the dialectical image, with Horkheimer and Adorno’s solution, the recovery of critical reflection through the fragmentary writing of Dialectic of Enlightenment
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John F. Kavanaugh (1975). "The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923-1950," by Martin Jay; "Critical Theory," by Max Horkheimer; "Dialectic of Enlightenment," by Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adomo; "Negative Dialectics," by Theodor W. Adorno; "The Jargon of Authenticity," by Theodor W. Adorno; and "The Critique of Domination," by Trent Schroyer. [REVIEW] Modern Schoolman 52 (4):427-432.
Karen S. Feldman (2011). Not Dialectical Enough: On Benjamin, Adorno, and Autonomous Critique. Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (4):336-362.
Todd Bates (2011). Baptizing Adorno's Odysseus. The European Legacy 15 (5):599-617.
Alison Stone (2006). Adorno and the Disenchantment of Nature. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):231-253.
Max Pensky (2004). Natural History: The Life and Afterlife of a Concept in Adorno. Critical Horizons 5 (1):227-258.
Marios Constantinou (2011). Allegorical Materialism. Angelaki 16 (1):63 - 78.
Adriana S. Benzaquén (1998). Thought and Utopia in the Writings of Adorno, Horkheimer, and Benjamin. Utopian Studies 9 (2):149 - 161.
John Abromeit (2011). Max Horkheimer and the Foundations of the Frankfurt School. Cambridge University Press.
Eric S. Nelson (2011). Revisiting the Dialectic of Environment: Nature as Ideology and Ethics in Adorno and the Frankfurt School. Telos 2011 (155):105-126.
Johann Kreuzer, Missing Links. Zum Denken der Erinnerung Bei Wittgenstein Und Bei Benjamin Und Adorno.
Orietta Ombrosi (2012). The Twilight of Reason: Benjamin, Adorno, Horkheimer and Levinas Tested by the Catastrophe. Gazelle [Distributor].
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads6 ( #217,978 of 1,140,270 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #86,093 of 1,140,270 )
How can I increase my downloads?