Could and Should the Ought Disappear from Ethics?

Abstract

In his 1961 monograph, Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority , the late phenomenologist, Emmanuel Levinas, noted that “everyone will readily agree that it is of the highest importance to know whether we are not duped by morality” (1961/1969, p. 21). What follows thereafter is an extensive attempt to ground a quasi-Kantian existential ethics based on interpersonal, face to face, relations (Beavers 2001). That philosophy should invite such an attempt already signifies that we might be in trouble where ethics are concerned. After all, when one looks back over history, it appears that we have not made much progress in this area

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Kant and the Problem of Ethical Metaphysics.Anthony F. Beavers - 2000 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (2-3):11-20.
An other face of ethics in Levinas.Barbara Jane Davy - 2007 - Ethics and the Environment 12 (1):39-66.
The ethics of Emmanuel Levinas.Diane Perpich - 2008 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
The role of metaethics and the future of computer ethics.Antonio Marturano - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (1):71-78.
Levinas as (mis)Reader of Spinoza.Michael Juffé - 2007 - Levinas Studies 2:153-173.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-16

Downloads
61 (#257,990)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anthony Beavers
University of Evansville

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references