Freud's oedipus and Kristeva's narcissus: Three heterogeneities
Hypatia 20 (1):54-77 (2005)
| Abstract | : The paper shows that three heterogeneities in Freud and Kristeva (unconscious/conscious, semiotic/symbolic, and imaginary/symbolic) expose the historical emergence, significance, and demise of psychic structures that present obstacles to our progressive political thinking. The oedipal and narcissistic structures of subjectivity represent the persistence of two past, bad forms of authority: paternal law and maternal authority. Contemporary psychoanalysis reveals a humankind going through the loss of this past in a process that opens up a different future of sexual difference in Western cultures | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKelly Oliver (1993). Julia Kristeva's Feminist Revolutions. Hypatia 8 (3):94 - 114.
Lynda Stone (2004). Crisis of the Educated Subject: Insight From Kristeva for American Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 23 (2/3):103-116.
Thea Harrington (1998). The Speaking Abject in Kristeva's "Powers of Horror". Hypatia 13 (1):138 - 157.
Jean-Joseph Goux (1993). Oedipus, Philosopher. Stanford University Press.
Ewa Ziarek (1992). At the Limits of Discourse: Heterogeneity, Alterity, and the Maternal Body in Kristeva's Thought. Hypatia 7 (2):91 - 108.
Judith Butler (1989). The Body Politics of Julia Kristeva. Hypatia 3 (3):104 - 118.
Mary Bittner Wiseman (1993). Renaissance Madonnas and the Fantasies of Freud. Hypatia 8 (3):115 - 135.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #134,900 of 556,803 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,803 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
