Hypatia 20 (1):54-77 (2005)
|Abstract||: The paper shows that three heterogeneities in Freud and Kristeva (unconscious/conscious, semiotic/symbolic, and imaginary/symbolic) expose the historical emergence, significance, and demise of psychic structures that present obstacles to our progressive political thinking. The oedipal and narcissistic structures of subjectivity represent the persistence of two past, bad forms of authority: paternal law and maternal authority. Contemporary psychoanalysis reveals a humankind going through the loss of this past in a process that opens up a different future of sexual difference in Western cultures|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kelly Oliver (1993). Julia Kristeva's Feminist Revolutions. Hypatia 8 (3):94 - 114.
Lynda Stone (2004). Crisis of the Educated Subject: Insight From Kristeva for American Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 23 (2/3):103-116.
Thea Harrington (1998). The Speaking Abject in Kristeva's "Powers of Horror". Hypatia 13 (1):138 - 157.
Jean-Joseph Goux (1993). Oedipus, Philosopher. Stanford University Press.
Ewa Ziarek (1992). At the Limits of Discourse: Heterogeneity, Alterity, and the Maternal Body in Kristeva's Thought. Hypatia 7 (2):91 - 108.
Evelien Geerts, Julia Kristeva’s Subversive Semiotic Politics. A Conceptual Analysis of Kristeva’s Notions of the Semiotic Chora, Maternity and Feminism.
Judith Butler (1989). The Body Politics of Julia Kristeva. Hypatia 3 (3):104 - 118.
Mary Bittner Wiseman (1993). Renaissance Madonnas and the Fantasies of Freud. Hypatia 8 (3):115 - 135.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #134,900 of 556,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?