Intrinsic value

Many philosophers apparently still accept the proposition that there is such a thing as intrinsic value, i.e., that some part of the value of some things (objects, events, or states of affairs) is intrinsic value. John Dewey's attack seems not to have dislodged this proposition, for today it is seldom questioned. I propose to press the attack again, in terms that owe a great deal to Dewey, as I understand him.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2105465
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Stephen E. Schmid (2009). Reconsidering Autotelic Play. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 36 (2):238-257.
Jerrold Levinson (2004). Intrinsic Value and the Notion of a Life. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (4):319–329.
Remy Debes (2009). Dignity's Gauntlet. Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):45-78.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

124 ( #21,175 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

14 ( #50,975 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.