Graduate studies at Western
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (4):475 – 493 (2000)
|Abstract||Consequence is at the heart of logic; an account of consequence, of what follows from what, offers a vital tool in the evaluation of arguments. Since philosophy itself proceeds by way of argument and inference, a clear view of what logical consequence amounts to is of central importance to the whole discipline. In this book JC Beall and Greg Restall present and defend what thay call logical pluralism, the view that there is more than one genuine deductive consequence relation, a position which has profound implications for many linguists as well as for philosophers. We should not search for one true logic, since there are many|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$10.10 used (75% off) $35.26 new (12% off) $35.28 direct from Amazon (12% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BC71.B425 2006|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nicole Wyatt (2004). What Are Beall and Restall Pluralists About? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (3):409 – 420.
Otávio Bueno & Scott A. Shalkowski (2009). Modalism and Logical Pluralism. Mind 118 (470):295-321.
Nicola Ciprotti & Luca Moretti (2009). Logical Pluralism is Compatible with Monism About Metaphysical Modality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2):275-284.
Patrick Allo (2007). Logical Pluralism and Semantic Information. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6):659 - 694.
Ole Thomassen Hjortland (2013). Logical Pluralism, Meaning-Variance, and VerbalDisputes. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2):355-373.
Jc Beall & Greg Restall (2006). Logical Pluralism. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads67 ( #16,182 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,077 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?