Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):185-208 (1994)
|Abstract||It is argued that, because of scientific essentialism, two currently popular arguments against the mind-body identity thesis -- the multiple-realizability argument and the Nagel-Jackson knowledge argument -- are unsatisfactory as they stand and that their problems are incurable. It is then argued that a refutation of the identity thesis in its full generality can be achieved by weaving together two traditional Cartesian arguments -- the modal argument and the certainty argument. This argument establishes, not just the falsity of the identity thesis, but also the metaphysical possibility of disembodiment|
|Keywords||Essentialism Identity Intuition Mental Property Metaphysics Mind-body Modality Descartes Twin Earth|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Clive Vernon Borst (1970). The Mind-Brain Identity Theory: A Collection of Papers. New York,St Martin's P..
Ausonio Marras (2001). On Putnam's Critique of Metaphysical Realism: Mind-Body Identity and Supervenience. Synthese 126 (3):407-426.
Frank Jackson (1995). Essentialism, Mental Properties, and Causation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:253-268.
Michael Esfeld (2005). Mental Causation and Mental Properties. Dialectica 59 (1):5-18.
Nick Treanor (2006). The Cogito and the Metaphysics of Mind. Philosophical Studies 130 (2):247-71.
C. P. Presley (ed.) (1967). The Identity Theory of Mind. University of Queensland Press.
George Bealer (1987). The Philosophical Limits of Scientific Essentialism. Philosophical Perspectives 1:289-365.
Tyler Burge (1993). Mind-Body Causation and Explanatory Practice. In John Heil & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford University Press.
George Bealer (1994). The Rejection of the Identity Thesis. In The Mind-Body Problem: A Guide to the Current Debate. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads149 ( #2,600 of 549,005 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,729 of 549,005 )
How can I increase my downloads?