Navigating the murky intersection between clinical and organizational ethics: A hybrid case taxonomy
Graduate studies at Western
Bioethics 25 (6):320-325 (2011)
|Abstract||Ethical challenges that arise within healthcare delivery institutions are currently categorized as either clinical or organizational, based on the type of issue. Despite this common binary issue-based methodology, empirical study and increasing academic dialogue indicate that a clear line cannot easily be drawn between organizational and clinical ethics. Disagreement around end-of-life treatments, for example, often spawn value differences amongst parties at both organizational and clinical levels and requires a resolution to address both the case at hand and large-scale underlying system-level confounders. I refer to issues that contain elements of both clinical and organizational issues as hybrids and propose a new taxonomy to characterize hybrid cases. I contend that salient contextual features of an ethical issue, such as where it is identified, who it impacts and where it is ideally resolved in relation to its scope of impact, should inform procedure. Implementation of a Hybrid taxonomy viewing ethical issues as existing on a continuum furthers that end. The primary goals are to 1) systematize thinking about ethical issues that arise within healthcare delivery institutions and 2) allow the content of the ethical challenge to drive the process, rather than continuing to rely on the traditional binary issue-based choice. Failure to capture the complexity of hybrid situations perpetuates incomplete information and ultimately an inchoate resolution that creates more questions than answers|
|Keywords||clinical ethics organizational ethics hybrid ethics taxonomy alternative dispute resolution stakeholder theory ethics continuum|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
George J. Agich (2009). The Issue of Expertise in Clinical Ethics. Diametros 22:3-20.
Patricia C. Kelley & Dawn R. Elm (2003). The Effect of Context on Moral Intensity of Ethical Issues: Revising Jones's Issue-Contingent Model. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 48 (2):139 - 154.
Tammy Swenson-Lepper (2005). Ethical Sensitivity for Organizational Communication Issues: Examining Individual and Organizational Differences. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 59 (3):205 - 231.
John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer (1991). The Clinical Ethicist at the Bedside. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
L. Dauwerse, T. A. Abma, B. Molewijk & G. Widdershoven (2013). Goals of Clinical Ethics Support: Perceptions of Dutch Healthcare Institutions. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 21 (4):323-337.
Stella Reiter-Theil, Marcel Mertz, Jan Schürmann, Nicola Stingelin Giles & Barbara Meyer-Zehnder (2011). Evidence – Competence – Discourse: The Theoretical Framework of the Multi-Centre Clinical Ethics Support Project Metap. Bioethics 25 (7):403-412.
Kristine Bærøe & Ole Frithjof Norheim (2011). Mapping Out Structural Features in Clinical Care Calling for Ethical Sensitivity: A Theoretical Approach to Promote Ethical Competence in Healthcare Personnel and Clinical Ethical Support Services (Cess). Bioethics 25 (7):394-402.
Laurence B. McCullough (2005). The Critical Turn in Clinical Ethics and its Continous Enhancement. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):1 – 8.
Richard Walsh-Bowers, Amy Rossiter & Isaac Prilleltensky (1996). The Personal is the Organizational in the Ethics of Hospital Social Workers. Ethics and Behavior 6 (4):321 – 335.
Linda Farber Post (2007). Handbook for Health Care Ethics Committees. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Added to index2009-12-01
Total downloads18 ( #74,621 of 739,401 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?