Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):322-325 (1999)
|Abstract||Mark Balaguer argues for full blooded platonism (FBP), and argues that FBP alone can solve Benacerraf's familiar epistemic challenge. I note that if FBP really can solve Benacerraf's epistemic challenge, then FBP is not alone in its capacity so to solve; RFBP—really full blooded platonism—can do the trick just as well, where RFBP differs from FBP by allowing entities from inconsistent mathematics. I also argue briefly that there is positive reason for endorsing RFBP|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Keith Gunderson (1994). Movements, Actions, the Internal, & Hauser Robots. Behavior and Philosophy 22 (1):29 - 33.
Mary Leng (2002). Review: Mark Balaguer, Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. [REVIEW] Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):516-518.
Larry Hauser (1994). Action Minus Movement: Wittgenstein's Question. Behavior and Philosophy 22 (1):23 - 28.
Wai-hung Wong (1999). Interpretive Charity, Massive Disagreement, and Imagination. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (1):49-74.
Wai-Hung Wong (1999). Interpretive Charity, Massive Disagreement, and Imagination. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (1):49-74.
Mark Balaguer (1995). A Platonist Epistemology. Synthese 103 (3):303 - 325.
Mark Balaguer (1998). Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Gabriel Rabin (2007). Full-Blooded Reference. Philosophia Mathematica 15 (3):357-365.
Greg Restall (2003). Just What is Full-Blooded Platonism? Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):82--91.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #29,783 of 722,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,046 of 722,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?