Sober on Intelligent Design Theory and the Intelligent Designer

Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):432-442 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Intelligent design theorists claim that their theory is neutral as to the identity of the intelligent designer, even with respect to whether it is a natural or a supernatural agent. In a recent issue of Faith and Philosophy, Elliott Sober has argued that in fact the theory is not neutral on this issue, and that it entails theexistence of a supernatural designer. I examine Sober’s argument and identify several hurdles it must overcome.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
244 (#75,067)

6 months
1 (#1,027,696)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Beaudoin
Northern Illinois University

Citations of this work

Intelligent design.William Hasker - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):586-597.

Add more citations