David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 23 (1):149-165 (2011)
While theories about interpreting biblical and other parables have long realised the importance of readers’ responses to the topic, recent results in social psychology concerning systematic self-deception raise unforeseen problems. In this paper I first set out some of the problems these results pose for the authority of fictional thought-experiments in moral philosophy. I then consider the suggestion that biblical parables face the same problems and as a result cannot work as devices for moral or religious instruction in the way that they are usually understood to work. I examine a number of influential theories about interpretation of the parables which might appear to deflect the problems, and argue that none of them are ultimately successful in doing so
|Keywords||Thought-experiments Parables Reader-response theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Edward A. Synan (1979). Thomas Aquinas: Propositions and Parables. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Govinda Chandra Dev (1984). Parables of the East. University of Dhaka.
Yitzy Erps (2009). Tales to Live By: Parables Based on Pirkei Avos. Mesorah Publications.
Brian Massumi (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Duke University Press.
Anthony C. Thiselton (2006). Thiselton on Hermeneutics: The Collected Writings of Anthony Thiselton. Ashgate Pub..
Peter Slater (1968). Parables, Analogues and Symbols. Religious Studies 4 (1):25 - 36.
Erik Larsen (2010). Parables of Exposure. Levinas Studies 5:151-165.
Michael Wood (1996). Kafka's China and the Parable of Parables. Philosophy and Literature 20 (2):325-337.
Russell J. DeSimone (1984). Augustine and the Parables of Jesus. Augustinian Studies 15:129-131.
Whalen Lai (1991). In Defence of Graded Love Three Parables From Mencius. Asian Philosophy 1 (1):51 – 60.
George F. Held (1987). Phoinix, Agamemnon And Achilleus: Parables and Paradeigmata. Classical Quarterly 37 (02):245-.
Jean-Yves Goffi & Sophie Roux (2011). On the Very Idea of a Thought Experiment. In Katerina Ierodiakonou & Sophie Roux (eds.), Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts. Brill
Richard Gill (1981). The Rime of the Ancient Mariner_ and _Crime and Punishment: Existential Parables. Philosophy and Literature 5 (2):131-149.
Dr Shiva Rijal (2011). Absurd, Parables and Double-Reed Flute. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 7 (16):70-72.
Added to index2011-05-16
Total downloads133 ( #14,809 of 1,724,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)51 ( #22,176 of 1,724,748 )
How can I increase my downloads?