South African Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):329-335 (2006)
|Abstract||In reaching his narrative view of the self in Oneself as Another, Paul Ricoeur argues that, while literature offers revealing insights into the nature of the self, the sort of fictions involving brain transplants, fission, and so on, that philosophers often take seriously do not (and cannot). My paper is a response to Ricoeur's charge, contending that the arguments Ricoeur rejects are not flawed in the way he suggests, and that his own arguments are sometimes guilty of the very charges he lays at the door of his opponents|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Piercey (2004). Ricoeur's Account of Tradition and the Gadamer–Habermas Debate. Human Studies 27 (3):259-280.
Cheryl Hughes (1999). Reconstructing the Subject of Human Rights. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (2):47-60.
Edi Pucci (1992). Review of Paul Ricoeur's Oneself as Another: Personal Identity, Narrative Identity and "Selfhood" in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Social Criticism 18 (2):185-209.
Paul Ricœur & Richard Kearney (eds.) (1996). Paul Ricoeur: The Hermeneutics of Action. Sage Publications.
Robert Piercey (2008). How Paul Ricoeur Changed the World. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (3):463-479.
Kevin J. Vanhoozer (1990). Biblical Narrative in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: A Study in Hermeneutics and Theology. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-07-29
Total downloads83 ( #9,020 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #4,088 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?