Metacognitive errors in change detection: Lab and life converge

Consciousness and Cognition 16 (1):58-62 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Smilek, Eastwood, Reynolds, and Kingstone suggests that the studies reported in Beck, M. R., Levin, D. T. and Angelone, B. A. are not ecologically valid. Here, we argue that not only are change blindness and change blindness blindness studies in general ecologically valid, but that the studies we reported in Beck, Levin, and Angelone, 2007 are as well. Specifically, we suggest that many of the changes used in our study could reasonably be expected to occur in the real world. Furthermore, the conclusion from Beck et al. that knowledge about the role of intention and scene complexity in change detection is not readily accessible applies not only to the laboratory studies we conducted but also to real world situations

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Change blindness and time to consciousness.Michael Niedeggen, Petra Wichmann & Petra Stoerig - 2001 - European Journal of Neuroscience 14 (10):1719-1726.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
45 (#309,587)

6 months
3 (#439,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile