Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):188-209 (2009)
|Abstract||Having no recourse to ways of knowing about the natural world, ethical non-naturalists are in need of an epistemology that might apply to a normative breed of facts or properties, and intuitionism seems well suited to fill that bill. Here I argue that the metaphysical inspiration for ethical intuitionism undermines that very epistemology, for this pair of views generates what I call the defeater from cosmic coincidence. Unfortunately, we face not a happy union, but a difficult choice: either ethical intuitionism or ethical non-naturalism, but not both.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew B. Schoedinger (2007). Nonreductive Ethical Naturalism. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:3-6.
Benjamin T. H. Smart & Karim P. Y. Thebault, Dispositional Essentialism: A Powerful Account of a Lazy World.
John Hacker-Wright (2009). Human Nature, Personhood, and Ethical Naturalism. Philosophy 84 (3):413-427.
Elizabeth Tropman (2008). Naturalism and the New Moral Intuitionism. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:163-84.
Phillip Stratton-Lake (ed.) (2002). Ethical Intuitionism: Re-Evaluations. Oxford University Press.
David Copp (2003). Why Naturalism? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):179-200.
Nicholas L. Sturgeon (2002). Ethical Intuitionism and Ethical Naturalism. In Phillip Stratton-Lake (ed.), Ethical Intuitionism: Re-evaluations. Oxford University Press.
Imtiaz Moosa (2007). Naturalistic Explanations of Apodictic Moral Claims: Brentano's Ethical Intuitionism and Nietzsche's Naturalism. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2):159 - 182.
Added to index2009-07-31
Total downloads71 ( #14,674 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,424 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?