Philosophical Perspectives 11:375-399 (1997)
|Abstract||An innocent form of emergence—what I call "weak emergence"—is now a commonplace in a thriving interdisciplinary nexus of scientific activity—sometimes called the "sciences of complexity"—that include connectionist modelling, non-linear dynamics (popularly known as "chaos" theory), and artificial life.1 After defining it, illustrating it in two contexts, and reviewing the available evidence, I conclude that the scientific and philosophical prospects for weak emergence are bright|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Kekes (1966). Physicalism, the Identity Theory, and the Concept of Emergence. Philosophy of Science 33 (December):360-75.
Hartmann Romer (2004). Weak Quantum Theory and the Emergence of Time. Mind and Matter 2 (2):105-125.
Mark Bedau (2011). Weak Emergence and Computer Simulation. In Paul Humphreys & Cyrille Imbert (eds.), Models, Simulations, and Representations. Routledge.
Carl Gillett (2002). The Varieties of Emergence: Their Purposes, Obligations and Importance. Grazer Philosophische Studien 65 (1):95-121.
David J. Chalmers (2006). Strong and Weak Emergence. In P. Davies & P. Clayton (eds.), The Re-Emergence of Emergence. Oxford University Press.
Paul Hovda (2008). Quantifying Weak Emergence. Minds and Machines 18 (4).
Paul Humphreys (2008). Computational and Conceptual Emergence. Philosophy of Science 75 (5):584-594.
Mark A. Bedau (2008). Is Weak Emergence Just in the Mind? Minds and Machines 18 (4).
Paul Humphreys (2008). Synchronic and Diachronic Emergence. Minds and Machines 18 (4).
Mark A. Bedau (2002). Downward Causation and the Autonomy of Weak Emergence. Principia 6 (1):5-50.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads157 ( #2,385 of 556,905 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #11,176 of 556,905 )
How can I increase my downloads?