Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (1):61 - 72 (2008)
|Abstract||The discourse about traceability in food chains focused on traceability as means towards the end of managing health risks. This discourse witnessed a call to broaden traceability to accommodate consumer concerns about foods that are not related to health. This call envisions the development of ethical traceability. This paper presents a justification of ethical traceability. The argument is couched in liberal distinctions, since the call for ethical traceability is based on intuitions about consumer rights to informed choice. The paper suggests that two versions of ethical traceability find justification. The first version of ethical traceability entails that governments ensure that all consumers are provided with foods that respect some threshold level of, e.g., animal welfare that is supported by an overlapping consensus. The second version of ethical traceability entails that food producers provide consumers with products, and sufficient information about these products, that are relevant for reasonable, non-superficial values that are not supported by an overlapping consensus. Governments should facilitate this in the sense that consumers are not provided with misinformation about characteristics of foods that are relevant for reasonable, non-superficial values that are not supported by an overlapping consensus|
|Keywords||Consumer concerns Food ethics Informed choice Liberalism Traceability|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
L. J. Frewer, A. Kole, S. M. A. Van de Kroon & C. de Lauwere (2005). Consumer Attitudes Towards the Development of Animal-Friendly Husbandry Systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (4):345-367.
Franck L. B. Meijboom, Tatjana Visak & Frans W. A. Brom (2006). From Trust to Trustworthiness: Why Information is Not Enough in the Food Sector. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (5):427-442.
Johannes Brinkmann (2004). Looking at Consumer Behavior in a Moral Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):129-141.
Chris MacDonald & Melissa Whellams (2007). Corporate Decisions About Labelling Genetically Modified Foods. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (2):181 - 189.
Luca Mari & Sergio Sartori (2007). A Relational Theory of Measurement: Traceability as a Solution to the Non-Transitivity of Measurement Results. Measurement 40 (2):233-242.
Klaus Peter Rippe (2000). Novel Foods and Consumer Rights: Concerning Food Policy in a Liberal State. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (1):71-80.
Frans W. A. Brom (2000). Food, Consumer Concerns, and Trust: Food Ethics for a Globalizing Market. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):127-139.
Tatiana Klompenhouwer & Henk van den Belt (2003). Regulating Functional Foods in the European Union: Informed Choice Versus Consumer Protection? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):545-556.
Helena Siipi & Susanne Uusitalo (2011). Consumer Autonomy and Availability of Genetically Modified Food. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (2):147-163.
Michiel Korthals (2001). Taking Consumers Seriously: Two Concepts of Consumer Sovereignty. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):201-215.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #60,137 of 722,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,437 of 722,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?