David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 149 (3):509-533 (2006)
According to ‘regularity theories’ of causation, the obtaining of causal relations depends on no more than the obtaining of certain kinds of regularity. Regularity theorists are thus anti-realists about necessary connections in nature. Regularity theories of one form or another have constituted the dominant view in analytic Philosophy for a long time, but have recently come in for some robust criticism, notably from Galen Strawson. Strawson’s criticisms are natural criticisms to make, but have not so far provoked much response from regularity theorists. The paper considers and rebuts Strawson’s objections. For example, Strawson claims that if there were no necessary connections in nature, we ought continually to find the regularity of the Universe surprising. I argue that the fact that the Universe is regular is something we take ourselves (fallibly) to know, and hence, in the light of this knowledge, its continued orderliness is not at all surprising.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Markus Schrenk (2010). The Powerlessness of Necessity. Noûs 44 (4):725-739.
Michael Esfeld (2007). Mental Causation and the Metaphysics of Causation. Erkenntnis 67 (2):207 - 220.
Jaakko Kuorikoski (2014). How to Be a Humean Interventionist. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (2):333-351.
Similar books and articles
Don Locke (1961). Strawson's Auditory Universe. Philosophical Review 70 (October):518-532.
Nick Haverkamp & Moritz Schulz (2012). A Note on Comparative Probability. Erkenntnis 76 (3):395-402.
Lei Zhong (2012). Counterfactuals, Regularity and the Autonomy Approach. Analysis 72 (1):75-85.
Georges Dicker (2000). Regularity, Conditionality, and Asymmetry in Causation. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:129-138.
Holly Andersen (2012). The Case for Regularity in Mechanistic Causal Explanation. Synthese 189 (3):415-432.
Michael Baumgartner (2008). Regularity Theories Reassessed. Philosophia 36 (3):327-354.
Helen Beebee (2003). Seeing Causing. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (3):257-280.
Justin Broackes (1993). Did Hume Hold a Regularity Theory of Causation? British Journal for the History of Philosophy 1 (1):99 – 114.
Galen Strawson (1989). The Secret Connexion: Causation, Realism, and David Hume. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads245 ( #1,792 of 1,102,845 )
Recent downloads (6 months)43 ( #1,832 of 1,102,845 )
How can I increase my downloads?