Ethical tools to support systematic public deliberations about the ethical aspects of agricultural biotechnologies
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (1):3-12 (2007)
|Abstract||This special issue of the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics presents so-called ethical tools that are developed to support systematic public deliberations about the ethical aspects of agricultural biotechnologies. This paper firstly clarifies the intended connotations of the term “ethical tools” and argues that such tools can support liberal democracies to cope with the issues that are raised by the application of genetic modification and other modern biotechnologies in agriculture and food production. The paper secondly characterizes the societal discussion on agricultural biotechnology and defends the thesis that normative perspectives fuel this discussion, so one cannot come to grips with this discussion if one neglects these perspectives. The paper thirdly agrues that no such thing exists as “one” societal debate in which these issues should be discussed. There are several interwined debates, and different actors participate in different discourses. Some practical instruments are necessary in order to include the right issues in these debates. These instruments will be coined as “ethical tools,” since they are practical instruments that can be used (tools) in order to support debates and deliberative structures for a systematic engagement with ethical issues (hence, ethical tools). Finally, the paper clarifies the ethics of these ethical tools and presents the tools as discussed in the remainder of this special issue: 1) tools to include ethical issues in public consulation and involvement; 2) tools to support systematic reflection upon ethical issues in decision-making; and 3) tools to support explicit communication about values in the food chain|
|Keywords||Ethical tools GM evaluation normative perspective societal debate values in the food chain participatory decision-making communicative space value pluralism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kate Millar, Erik Thorstensen, Sandy Tomkins, Ben Mepham & Matthias Kaiser (2007). Developing the Ethical Delphi. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (1):53-63.
S. Andrew Ostapski, John Oliver & Gaston T. Gonzalez (1996). The Legal and Ethical Components of Executive Decision-Making: A Course for Business Managers. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5):571 - 579.
Ellen-Marie Forsberg (2007). Value Pluralism and Coherentist Justification of Ethical Advice. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (1):81-97.
Iordanis Kavathatzopoulos (2003). The Use of Information and Communication Technology in the Training for Ethical Competence in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 48 (1):43 - 51.
Steven S. Coughlin (2008). Using Cases with Contrary Facts to Illustrate and Facilitate Ethical Analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1):103-110.
Julian Baggini & Peter S. Fosl (2003). The Philosopher's Toolkit: A Compendium of Philosophical Concepts and Methods. Blackwell Publishers.
Raymond E. Spier (1999). An Approach to the Ethics of Cloning Humans Via an Examination of the Ethical Issues Pertaining to the Use of Any Tool. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):17-32.
M. Deblonde, R. de Graaff & F. Brom (2007). An Ethical Toolkit for Food Companies: Reflections on its Use. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (1):99-118.
Matthias Kaiser, Kate Millar, Erik Thorstensen & Sandy Tomkins (2007). Developing the Ethical Matrix as a Decision Support Framework: GM Fish as a Case Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (1):65-80.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,469 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?