Lyrical Sociability: The Social Contract and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Philosophy and Literature 39 (2):406-421 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although all readers of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein agree with Victor that his creation of the monster was a mistake, few are certain about how it should be resolved. Shelley offers two vexed solutions to the problem of the creature. The first, explored in the plot of Frankenstein, unfolds with an air of tragic inevitability; Victor destroys his creature and—by extension—himself. But the second solution that Shelley raises, through the creature’s earnest behest that Victor make him a partner, also presents obstacles. Shelley invites her readers to sympathize with the monster’s predicament, but not with its resolution in the nightmarish prospect of a “race of devils … propagated upon the earth, who might make the..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Frankenstein.Mary Shelley & J. Paul Hunter - 1997 - Utopian Studies 8 (1):230-231.
The Human Face of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.F. P. Crawley - 1996 - Analecta Husserliana 49:195-202.
Hume and Mary Shelley.D. Wormersley - 1986 - Notes and Queries 33:164-5.
Beginning life: Mary Shelley's introduction to Frankenstein.Richard Lansdown - 1995 - Critical Review (University of Melbourne) 35:81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-30

Downloads
74 (#215,284)

6 months
20 (#119,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references