Using Discourse to Restore Organisational Legitimacy: 'CEO-speak' After an Incident in a German Nuclear Power Plant [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 108 (1):101-120 (2012)
|Abstract||We analyse managerial discourse in corporate communication (‘CEO-speak’) during a 6-month period following a legitimacy-threatening event in the form of an incident in a German nuclear power plant. As discourses express specific stances expressed by a group of people who share particular beliefs and values, they constitute an important means of restoring organisational legitimacy when social rules and norms have been violated. Using an analytical framework based on legitimacy as a process of reciprocal sense-making and consisting of three levels of analysis which capture the relationship between text and context, we investigate the discourse used by CEOs in their initial and subsequent accounts of the incident. We find that CEOs aim to negotiate a resolution between their initial account and organisational audiences’ incongruent interpretations of the event by adopting an ad hoc normative attitude to stakeholders. This manifests itself in the strategic use of the discourse of stakeholder engagement as a means of signalling change, yet maintaining the status quo. It suggests that CEOs strategically use discourse to manufacture organisational audiences’ consent regarding the continued operation of the nuclear power plant affected by the incident. Our findings contribute to the critical corporate communication literature which regards corporate narrative reporting as a means of consolidating the private interests of corporations, rather than increasing transparency and accountability.|
|Keywords||Legitimacy Impression management Nuclear industry Discourse Stakeholder management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Cyrlene Claasen & Julia Roloff (2012). The Link Between Responsibility and Legitimacy: The Case of De Beers in Namibia. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):379-398.
Gabriel Eweje & Minyu Wu (2010). Corporate Response to an Ethical Incident: The Case of an Energy Company in New Zealand. Business Ethics 19 (4):379-392.
James D. Werbel & Suzanne M. Carter (2002). The Ceo's Influence on Corporate Foundation Giving. Journal of Business Ethics 40 (1):47 - 60.
Jean-Pascal Gond & Olivier Herrbach (2006). Social Reporting as an Organisational Learning Tool? A Theoretical Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (4):359 - 371.
MaryAnn Reynolds & Kristi Yuthas (2008). Moral Discourse and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):47 - 64.
William Beaver (1994). Nuclear Nightmares in the Philippines. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (4):271 - 279.
Guido Palazzo & Andreas Georg Scherer (2006). Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):71 - 88.
Daniel J. Slater & Heather R. Dixon-Fowler (2009). Ceo International Assignment Experience and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (3):473 - 489.
Robert Phillips (2003). Stakeholder Legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):25-41.
A. Buchanan (2011). Reciprocal Legitimation: Reframing the Problem of International Legitimacy. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):5-19.
T. Ketola (2006). Corporate Psychological Defences: An Oil Spill Case. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 65 (2):149 - 161.
Adele Santana (2012). Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
Jiafeng Zhu (2012). Legitimacy as a Mere Moral Power? A Response to Applbaum. Diametros 33 (33):120-137.
Added to index2011-10-14
Total downloads15 ( #86,080 of 739,168 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,168 )
How can I increase my downloads?