Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (3):219 - 234 (2009)
|Abstract||This paper begins with a critical part and concludes with a constructive part. First, with reference to a definition of liberalism and using immanent critique, I show deficiencies in the claims of four selfprofessed postliberals to have articulated non-liberal positions. Then, I argue that postliberal political theory consists in acknowledging that in political contexts some voluntary groups as such can be moral, not merely political, agents. Analysis of what moral autonomy is for persons as empirical (not noumenal) agents reveals that that account can be transposed to some groups. A key common element among the four rejected positions is their emphasis on the normative authority of some practices as over against principles. My proposal congeals that normative emphasis on the social into group-moral authority. Recognition of some voluntary groups’ episodic moral authority over their members is non-liberal but not anti-liberal.|
|Keywords||Group autonomy Individual autonomy Liberalism Liberal theory Moral agent Postliberalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Grenville Wall (1975). Moral Authority and Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 4 (2):95-99.
Gerald Gaus (2010). On Two Critics of Justificatory Liberalism: A Response to Wall and Lister. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (2):177-212.
Craig L. Carr (2010). Liberalism and Pluralism: The Politics of E Pluribus Unum. Palgrave Macmillan.
Andrew Sharp (1999). 'What If Value and Rights Lie Foundationally in Groups?' The Maori Case. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (2):1-28.
Dwight Boyd* † (2004). The Legacies of Liberalism and Oppressive Relations: Facing a Dilemma for the Subject of Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 33 (1):3-22.
Sune lægaard (2005). On the Prospects for a Liberal Theory of Recognition. Res Publica 11 (4):325-348.
Menachem Mautner, From 'Honor' to 'Dignity': How Should a Liberal State Treat Non-Liberal Cultural Groups?
E. Glen Weyl (2009). Whose Rights? A Critique of Individual Agency as the Basis of Rights. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (2):139-171.
Michael D. Smith (1982). The Virtuous Organization. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):35-42.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #81,717 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?