Elementary- and Middle-school Teachers' Reasoning about Intervening in School Violence: An examination of violence-prone school subcontexts
Journal of Moral Education 30 (2):131-153 (2001)
|Abstract||The study compared middle-school and elementary-school teachers' (N = 108) reasoning about their professional roles when violence occurred in "undefined" and potentially violence-prone school subcontexts (e.g. hallways, cafeterias, playgrounds). The study combined concepts from urban planing, architecture, criminology and cognitive developmental domain theory to explore teachers' moral attributions towards school spaces. Participants were asked to locate dangerous locations and discuss their professional roles in those locations. Teachers were also given hypothetical situations where the specific subcontexts (i.e. hallways, classroom, school yard) and school type (middle versus elementary schools) were systematically manipulated to assess the impact of context on reasoning and judgement. The results indicated that middle-school teachers were more likely than elementary-school teachers to identify school subcontexts where they would not intervene. Middle-school teachers' reasoning patterns were closely associated with their perceived role in "undefined" spaces. Furthermore, middle-school teachers' reasoning about intervention was complex and included moral, social-conventional and personal explanations as to why intervention was not possible in all school subcontexts. In contrast, elementary school teachers were more likely to perceive the entire school context as within their professional purview. Their reasoning about intervention focused mainly on the potential physical harm to the students. The data imply that teachers' views of "role within context" and "subcontext" influence their decisions to intervene or not intervene. Implications for research, theory and intervention are discussed|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Judith A. Maccallum (1993). Teacher Reasoning and Moral Judgement in the Context of Student Discipline Situations. Journal of Moral Education 22 (1):3-17.
Nava Maslovaty (2000). Teachers' Choice of Teaching Strategies for Dealing with Socio-Moral Dilemmas in the Elementary School. Journal of Moral Education 29 (4):429-444.
Spencer J. Maxcy (2002). Ethical School Leadership. Scarecrow Press.
Ann Higgins (1995). Teaching as a Moral Activity: Listening to Teachers in Russia and the United States. Journal of Moral Education 24 (2):143-158.
John M. Rybash (1980). How Teachers Help Children Resolve Moral Dilemmas. Journal of Moral Education 10 (1):18-23.
Kirsi Tirri (1999). Teachers' Perceptions of Moral Dilemmas at School. Journal of Moral Education 28 (1):31-47.
Maurice Farris Seay (1938). Unprofessional Activities of Teachers in Appointments and in School Board Elections. Lexington, Ky.,The University of Kentucky.
June Paradise Maul (1980). A High School with Intensive Education: Moral Atmosphere and Moral Reasoning. Journal of Moral Education 10 (1):9-17.
Pamela B. Joseph & Sara Efron (1993). Moral Choices/Moral Conflicts: Teachers' Self‐Perceptions. Journal of Moral Education 22 (3):201-220.
Joseph P. Hester (2003). Ethical Leadership for School Administrators and Teachers. Mcfarland & Co..
Ju´Lio Rique & Maria Tereza Lins-Dyer (2003). Teachers' Views of Forgiveness for the Resolution of Conflicts Between Students in School. Journal of Moral Education 32 (3):233-250.
Steve Parsons (1997). British Communist Party School Teachers in the 1940s and 1950s. Science and Society 61 (1):46 - 67.
Michael J. Reiss (1995). Conflicting Philosophies of School Sex Education. Journal of Moral Education 24 (4):371-382.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads3 ( #212,976 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?