Leo Strauss, Max Weber, and the Scientific Study of Politics
University of Chicago Press (2003)
| Abstract | Can politics be studied scientifically, and if so, how? Assuming it is impossible to justify values by human reason alone, social science has come to consider an unreflective relativism the only viable basis, not only for its own operations, but for liberal societies more generally. Although the experience of the sixties has made social scientists more sensitive to the importance of values, it has not led to a fundamental reexamination of value relativism, which remains the basis of contemporary social science. Almost three decades after Leo Strauss's death, Nasser Behnegar offers the first sustained exposition of what Strauss was best known for: his radical critique of contemporary social science, and particularly of political science. Behnegar's impressive book argues that Strauss was not against the scientific study of politics, but he did reject the idea that it could be built upon political science's unexamined assumption of the distinction between facts and values. Max Weber was, for Strauss, the most profound exponent of values relativism in social science, and Behnegar's explication artfully illuminates Strauss's critique of Weber's belief in the ultimate insolubility of all value conflicts. Strauss's polemic against contemporary political science was meant to make clear the contradiction between its claim of value-free premises and its commitment to democratic principles. As Behnegar ultimately shows, values--the ethical component lacking in a contemporary social science--are essential to Strauss's project of constructing a genuinely scientific study of politics | |||||||||
| Keywords | Cultural relativism | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | $22.22 new (12% off) $35.67 direct from Amazon (18% off) Amazon page | |||||||||
| Call number | JC251.S8.B45 2003 | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 0226041425 0226041433 9780226041421 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJacob Schiff (2010). From Anti-Liberal to Untimely Liberal: Leo Strauss' Two Critiques of Liberalism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (2):157-181.
Cropsey, Joseph & [From Old Catalog] (1964). Ancients and Moderns; Essays on the Tradition of Political Philosophy in Honor of Leo Strauss. New York, Basic Books.
Matthew Sharpe (2011). 'In the Court of a Great King': Some Remarks on Leo Strauss' Introduction to the Guide for the Perplexed. Sophia 50 (1):141-158.
Leora Faye Batnitzky (2006). Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas: Philosophy and the Politics of Revelation. Cambridge University Press.
Laurence Lampert (1996). Leo Strauss and Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press.
Heinrich Meier (2006). Leo Strauss and the Theological-Political Problem. Cambridge University Press.
Bart Schultz (2007). Review Essay: Mr. Smith Does Not Go to Washington. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (3):366-386.
Leo Strauss (1997). Spinoza's Critique of Religion. University of Chicago Press.
Thomas L. Pangle (2006). Leo Strauss: An Introduction to His Thought and Intellectual Legacy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Catherine H. Zuckert (2006). The Truth About Leo Strauss: Political Philosophy and American Democracy. University of Chicago Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads13 ( #87,931 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
