Privileged, typical, or not even that? – Our place in the world according to the copernican and the cosmological principles
Graduate studies at Western
Journal for General Philosophy of Science 37 (2):225 - 256 (2006)
|Abstract||If we are to constrain our place in the world, two principles are often appealed to in science. According to the Copernican Principle, we do not occupy a privileged position within the Universe. The Cosmological Principle, on the other hand, says that our observations would roughly be the same, if we were located at any other place in the Universe. In our paper we analyze these principles from a logical and philosophical point of view. We show how they are related, how they can be supported and what use is made of them. Our main results are: 1. There is a logical gap between both principles insofar as the Cosmological Principle is significantly stronger than the Copernican Principle. 2. A step that is often taken for establishing the Cosmological Principle on the base of the Copernican Principle and observations is not incontestable as it stands, but can be supplemented with a different argument. 3. The Cosmological Principle might be crucial for cosmology to the extent it is not supported by empirical evidence|
|Keywords||Cosmology Cosmological Principle Copernican Principle|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Carlton W. Berenda (1964). On the Cosmological Indeterminacy Principle of Mccrae. Philosophy of Science 31 (3):265-270.
Patrick Francken & Heimir Geirsson (1999). Regresses, Sufficient Reasons, and Cosmological Arguments. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:285-304.
Joel Primack (2005). Modern Cosmology and Some Implications for Religion. Faith and Philosophy 22 (5):615-621.
Alexander Pruss (1999). A New Cosmological Argument. Religious Studies 35 (4):461 - 476.
Graham Oppy (2000). On ‘a New Cosmological Argument’. Religious Studies 36 (3):345-353.
Elmar J. Kremer (1997). The Cosmological Argument Without the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Faith and Philosophy 14 (1):62-70.
S. Roush (2003). Copernicus, Kant, and the Anthropic Cosmological Principles. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (1):5-35.
Graham Oppy (2004). Faulty Reasoning About Default Principles in Cosmological Arguments. Faith and Philosophy 21 (2):242-249.
Claus Beisbart (2009). Can We Justifiably Assume the Cosmological Principle in Order to Break Model Underdetermination in Cosmology? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40 (2):175 - 205.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,394 of 739,317 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,317 )
How can I increase my downloads?