Graduate studies at Western
In Jerome Lang & Ulle Endriss (eds.), Computational Social Choice 2006. University of Amsterdam (2006)
|Abstract||The choice of a social decision rule for a federal assembly aﬀects the welfare distribution within the federation. But which decision rules can be recommended on welfarist grounds? In this paper, we focus on two welfarist desiderata, viz. (i) maximizing the expected utility of the whole federation and (ii) equalizing the expected utilities of people from different states in the federation. We consider the European Union as an example, set up a probabilistic model of decision making and explore how diﬀerent decision rules fare with regard to the desiderata. We start with a default model, where the interests, and therefore the votes of the diﬀerent states are not correlated. This default model is then abandoned in favor of models with correlations. We perform computer simulations and ﬁnd that decision rules with a low acceptance threshold do generally better in terms of desideratum (i), whereas the rules presented in the Accession Treaty and in the (still unratiﬁed) Constitution of the European Union tend to do better in terms of desideratum (ii). The ranking obtained regarding desideratum (i) is fairly stable across diﬀerent correlation patterns.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Martin Peterson & Sven Ove Hansson (2005). Order-Independent Transformative Decision Rules. Synthese 147 (2):323-342.
Luba Sapir (1998). The Optimality of the Expert and Majority Rules Under Exponentially Distributed Competence. Theory and Decision 45 (1):19-36.
Martin Peterson (2003). Transformative Decision Rules. Erkenntnis 58 (1):71-85.
Jacob Paroush (1997). Order Relations Among Efficient Decision Rules. Theory and Decision 43 (3):209-218.
Claus Beisbart, Luc Bovens & Stephan Hartmann (2005). A Utilitarian Assessment of Alternative Decision Rules in the Council of Ministers. European Union Politics 6 (4):395-419.
Stephan Hartmann, Claus Beisbart & Luc Bovens (2005). A Utilitarian Assessment of Alternative Decision Rules in the Council of Ministers. European Union Politics 6 (4):395-419.
Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (2010). Welfarist Evaluations of Decision Rules Under Interstate Utility Dependencies. Social Choice and Welfare 34 (2):315-344.
Stephan Hartmann & C. Beisbart (2006). Welfarism and the Assessments of Social Decision Rules. In Ulle Endriss (ed.), Computational Social Choice 2006.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #131,747 of 731,339 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,863 of 731,339 )
How can I increase my downloads?