A theory of causation: Causae causantes (originating causes) as inus conditions in branching space-times
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):221-253 (2005)
permits a sound and rigorously definable notion of ‘originating cause’ or causa causans—a type of transition event—of an outcome event. Mackie has famously suggested that causes form a family of ‘inus’ conditions, where an inus condition is ‘an insufficient but non-redundant part of an unnecessary but sufficient condition’. In this essay the needed concepts of BST theory are developed in detail, and it is then proved that the causae causantes of a given outcome event have exactly the structure of a set of Mackie inus conditions. The proof requires the assumption that there is no EPR-like ‘funny business’. This seems enough to constitute a theory of ‘causation’ in at least one of its many senses. Introduction The cement of the universe Preliminaries 3.1 First definitions and postulates 3.2 Ontology: propositions 3.3 Ontology: initial events 3.4 Ontology: outcome events 3.5 Ontology: transition events 3.6 Propositional language applied to events Causae causantes 4.1 Causae causantes are basic primary transition events 4.2 Causae causantes of an outcome chain 4.3 No funny business Causae causantes and inns and inus conditions 5.1 Inns conditions of outcome chains: not quite 5.2 Inns conditions of outcome chains 5.3 Inns conditions of scattered outcome events 5.4 Inus conditions for disjunctive outcome events 5.5 Inns and inus conditions of transition events Counterfactual conditionals Appendix: Tense and modal connectives in BST.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ming Xu (2010). Combinations of Stit and Actions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (4):485-503.
Jeremy Butterfield (2007). Stochastic Einstein Locality Revisited. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):805 - 867.
Similar books and articles
Tomasz Placek, On Propensity-Frequentist Models for Stochastic Phenomena; with Applications to Bell's Theorem.
A. J. Dale (1984). INUS Conditions. Analysis 44 (4):186 - 188.
Giovanni Boniolo & Gabriele De Anna (2006). The Four Faces of Omission. Philosophical Explorations 9 (3):277 – 293.
Hermann Weidemann (2006). Akzidentelle Verursachung. Ein Aristotelischer Gedanke Aus Moderner Sicht. Philosophia Naturalis 43 (2):214-231.
Nuel Belnap (2003). No-Common-Cause EPR-Like Funny Business in Branching Space-Times. Philosophical Studies 114 (3):199 - 221.
Michael J. Futch (2005). Leibnizian Causation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):451-467.
Thomas Müller (2005). Probability Theory and Causation: A Branching Space-Times Analysis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):487 - 520.
Matthew Weiner & Nuel Belnap (2006). How Causal Probabilities Might Fit Into Our Objectively Indeterministic World. Synthese 149 (1):1--36.
Nuel Belnap (2002). EPR-Like “Funny Business” in the Theory of Branching Space-Times. In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-Locality and Modality. Kluwer. 293--315.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads50 ( #46,316 of 1,696,507 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #56,497 of 1,696,507 )
How can I increase my downloads?