Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||A conservation principles tell us that some quantity, quality, or aspect remains constant through change. Such principles appear already in ancient and medieval natural philosophy. In one important strand of Greek cosmology, the rotatory motion of the celestial orbs is eternal and immutable. In optics, from at least the time of Euclid, the angle of reflection is equal to the angle of incidence when a ray of light is reflected. According to some versions of the medieval impetus theory of motion, impetus remains in a projected body (and the associated motion persists) permanently unless the body is subject to outside interference. These examples could be multiplied. But it was in the seventeenth century that conservation principles began to play an absolutely central role in scientific theories. Each of Galileo Galilei, René Descartes, Christiaan Huygens, Gottfried Leibniz, and Isaac Newton founded his approach to physics upon the principle of inertia—that unless interfered with a body will undergo uniform rectilinear motion. A multitude of other conservation principles gained currency during the seventeenth century—some still with us, some long ago left behind. Descartes provides an interesting example of an author who attempted to derive all of his physical principles from conservation laws (Principles of Philosophy, see especially articles 36 to 42 of Part II). Descartes believed that the principles of his physics could be derived from the immutability of God, supplemented only by very weak assumptions about the existence of change in the world. He claims, in fact, that we ought to postulate the strongest conservation laws consistent with such change. These include.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Peter McLaughlin (1993). Descartes on Mind-Body Interaction and the Conservation of Motion. Philosophical Review 102 (2):155-182.
Philip Mirowski (1984). The Role of Conservation Principles in Twentieth-Century Economic Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14 (4):461-473.
Sungho Choi (2003). The Conserved Quantity Theory of Causation and Closed Systems. Philosophy of Science 70 (3):510-530.
Geoffrey Gorham (2005). The Metaphysical Roots of Cartesian Physics: The Law of Rectilinear Motion. Perspectives on Science 13 (4):431-451.
Sophie Gibb (2010). Closure Principles and the Laws of Conservation of Energy and Momentum. Dialectica 64 (3):363-384.
Robert E. Butts (1984). Kant's Philosophy of Science: The Transition From Metaphysics to Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:685 - 705.
Oliver Schulte (2000). Inferring Conservation Laws in Particle Physics: A Case Study in the Problem of Induction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):771-806.
Stephen Menn (1990). Descartes and Some Predecessors on the Divine Conservation of Motion. Synthese 83 (2):215 - 238.
Added to index2009-08-04
Total downloads36 ( #38,062 of 731,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 731,540 )
How can I increase my downloads?