British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):255 - 291 (2005)
|Abstract||Two symmetry arguments are discussed, each purporting to show that there is no more room for a preferred division of spacetime into instants of time in general relativistic cosmology than in Minkowski spacetime. The first argument is due to Gödel, and concerns the symmetries of his famous rotating cosmologies. The second turns upon the symmetries of a certain space of relativistic possibilities. Both arguments are found wanting. Introduction Symmetry arguments Gödel's argument 3.1 Time in special relativity 3.2 Time in the standard cosmological models 3.3 Time in Gödel's stationary rotating solutions 3.4 Gödel's argument for the significance of these results 3.5 Is Gödel's argument successful? Another argument 4.1 Time-translation invariance in classical mechanics 4.2 Time-translation invariance in general relativity? 4.3 Time-translation invariance in dust cosmology 4.4 Is this second argument successful? Conclusion.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Earman (2002). What Time Reversal Invariance is and Why It Matters. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):245 – 264.
Howard Stein (1970). On the Paradoxical Time-Structures of Gödel. Philosophy of Science 37 (4):589-601.
Joseph Diekemper (2005). Logical Determinateness, Fixity, and the Symmetry of Time. Philosophical Papers 34 (1):1-24.
Chris Smeenk & Christian Wuthrich (2011). Time Travel and Time Machines. In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press.
Mauro Dorato (2002). On Becoming, Cosmic Time and Rotating Universes. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 50:253-.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #71,150 of 722,764 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,764 )
How can I increase my downloads?