Enthusiasm for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fmri) often overlooks its dependence on task selection and performance
American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):23 – 25 (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMoriah E. Thomason (2009). Children in Non-Clinical Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Fmri) Studies Give the Scan Experience a “Thumbs Up”. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):25 – 27.
Kim Celone & Chantal Stern (2009). A Neuroimaging Perspective on the Use of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Fmri) in Educational and Legal Systems. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):28 – 29.
Adrian M. Owen, Martin R. Coleman, Melanie Boly, Matthew H. Davis, Steven Laureys & John D. Pickard (2007). Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Covert Awareness in the Vegetative State. Archives of Neurology 64 (8):1098-1102.
Caitlin M. Connors & Ilina Singh (2009). What We Should Really Worry About in Pediatric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Fmri). American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):16 – 18.
Allyson C. Rosen (2009). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Fmri) in the Classroom. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1):30 – 31.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #93,337 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
