Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):486-488 (1999)
|Abstract||then E has a subset which is the domain of a model of Peano's axioms for the natural numbers. (This result is proved explicitly, using classical reasoning, in section 3 of .) My purpose in this note is to strengthen this result in two directions: first, the premise will be weakened so as to require only that the map ν be defined on the family of (Kuratowski) finite subsets of the set E, and secondly, the argument will be constructive, i.e., will involve no use of the law of excluded middle. To be precise, we will prove, in constructive (or intuitionistic) set theory3, the following..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Feng Ye (2000). Toward a Constructive Theory of Unbounded Linear Operators. Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):357-370.
John Bell (1999). Boolean Algebras and Distributive Lattices Treated Constructively. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 45 (1):135-143.
Bas Spitters (2006). A Constructive View on Ergodic Theorems. Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (2):611 - 623.
John Bell (2008). The Axiom of Choice and the Law of Excluded Middle in Weak Set Theories. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (2):194-201.
Erik Palmgren (1998). Developments in Constructive Nonstandard Analysis. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):233-272.
Robert S. Lubarsky & Michael Rathjen (2008). On the Constructive Dedekind Reals. Logic and Analysis 1 (2):131-152.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #170,048 of 722,934 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,934 )
How can I increase my downloads?