Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):449-472 (2011)
|Abstract||Some attitudes typically take whole persons as their objects. Shame, contempt, disgust and admiration have this feature, as do many tokens of love and hate. Objectors complain that these ‘globalist attitudes’ can never fit their targets and thus can never be all-things-considered appropriate. Those who dismiss all globalist attitudes in this way are misguided. The fittingness objection depends on an inaccurate view of the person-assessments at the heart of the globalist attitudes. Once we understand the nature of globalist attitudes and we recognize that we may legitimately treat some traits as more important than others in our overall evaluation of persons, we ought to conclude that our globalist attitudes can, in some cases, fit their targets and should not be summarily dismissed as unfitting. Our relationships contour the fittingness-conditions of globalist attitudes. This relational element poses a problem for fitting-attitude theories of value|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Justin D.’Arms (2013). Value and the Regulation of the Sentiments. Philosophical Studies 163 (1):3-13.
Richard Yetter Chappell (2012). Fittingness: The Sole Normative Primitive. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):684-704.
Alex Grzankowski (2012). Not All Attitudes Are Propositional. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4).
Katie McShane (forthcoming). Neosentimentalism and the Valence of Attitudes. Philosophical Studies.
C. Schemmel (2012). Distributive and Relational Equality. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):123-148.
Alex Grzankowski (forthcoming). Attitudes Without Propositions. European Journal of Philosophy.
Jens Johansson (2009). Fitting Attitudes, Welfare, and Time. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (3):247 - 256.
William Child (2006). Memory, Expression, and Past-Tense Self-Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):54–76.
Sørenarnow H. Klausen (2008). The Phenomenology of Propositional Attitudes. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (4).
K. Bykvist (2009). No Good Fit: Why the Fitting Attitude Analysis of Value Fails. Mind 118 (469):1-30.
Niclas Rönnström (2013). From Globalist to Cosmopolitan Learning: On the Reflexive Modernization of Teacher Education. Ethics and Global Politics 5 (4).
Lynne Rudder Baker (1996). Science and the Attitudes: A Reply to Sanford. Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):187-189.
Lynne Rudder Baker (1995). Explaining Attitudes. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-11-03
Total downloads45 ( #24,555 of 549,124 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,124 )
How can I increase my downloads?