David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 53 (1):1-19 (2010)
The aim of this inquiry is to investigate Heidegger's ontology of technology. We will show that this ontology is aporetic. In Heidegger's key technical essays, ?The question concerning technology? and its earlier versions ?Enframing? and ?The danger?, enframing is described as the ontological basis of modern life. But the account of enframing is ambiguous. Sometimes it is described as totally binding and at other times it appears to allow for exceptions. This oscillation between, what we will call total enframing and partial enframing, is underscored in the work of two influential scholars of Heidegger's later thought, Hubert Dreyfus and Iain Thomson. We will show that like Heidegger, Dreyfus and Thomson unwittingly perpetuate this dilemma that ultimately covers up the aporetic structure of enframing
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert C. Scharff (forthcoming). On Living with Technology Through Renunciation and Releasement. Foundations of Science:1-6.
Similar books and articles
Falguni A. Sheth (2004). The Technology of Race. Radical Philosophy Review 7 (1):77-98.
Søren Riis (2011). Towards the Origin of Modern Technology: Reconfiguring Martin Heidegger's Thinking. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 44 (1):103-117.
Don Ihde (2010). Heidegger's Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives. Fordham University Press.
L. Khong (2003). Actants and Enframing: Heidegger and Latour on Technology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):693-704.
Iain Thomson (2010). Heidegger's Aesthetics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Iain Thomson (2000). What's Wrong with Being a Technological Essentialist? A Response to Feenberg. Inquiry 43 (4):429 – 444.
J. M. Magrini (2011). Worlds Apart in the Curriculum: Heidegger, Technology, and the Poietic Attunement of Literature. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (5):500-521.
Iain Thomson (2000). From the Question Concerning Technology to the Quest for a Democratic Technology: Heidegger, Marcuse, Feenberg. Inquiry 43 (2):203 – 215.
Added to index2010-07-27
Total downloads72 ( #58,576 of 1,796,217 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #208,919 of 1,796,217 )
How can I increase my downloads?