Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The opposed concepts of continuity and discreteness have figured prominently in the development of mathematics, and have also commanded the attention of philosophers. Continuous entities may be characterized by the fact that they can be divided indefinitely without altering their essential nature. So, for instance, the water in a bucket may be indefinitely halved and yet remain water. (For the purposes of illustration I ignore the atomic nature of matter which has been established by modern physics.) Discrete entities, on the other hand, typically cannot be divided without effecting a change in their nature: half a wheel is plainly no longer a wheel. Thus we have two contrasting properties: on the one hand, the property of being indivisible, separate or discrete, and, on the other, the property of being indefinitely divisible and continuous although not actually divided into parts.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Robert Fink (1974). Continuum: The Evolution of Matter Into Humankind: A Case for the Arts, Ecology, & Revolution. Greenwich-Meridian.
Michael J. White (1988). On Continuity: Aristotle Versus Topology? History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (1):1-12.
Richard T. W. Arthur (1986). Leibniz on Continuity. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:107 - 115.
Sheldon R. Smith (2007). Continuous Bodies, Impenetrability, and Contact Interactions: The View From the Applied Mathematics of Continuum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):503 - 538.
Richard Arthur, Leibniz's Syncategorematic Infinitesimals, Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis, and Newton's Proposition.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #86,111 of 740,413 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,413 )
How can I increase my downloads?