David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 49 (3):355-379 (1982)
This paper treats some of the issues raised by Putnam's discussion of, and claims for, quantum logic, specifically: that its proposal is a response to experimental difficulties; that it is a reasonable replacement for classical logic because its connectives retain their classical meanings, and because it can be derived as a logic of tests. We argue that the first claim is wrong (1), and that while conjunction and disjunction can be considered to retain their classical meanings, negation crucially does not. The argument is conducted via a thorough analysis of how the meet, join and complementation operations are defined in the relevant logical structures, respectively Boolean- and ortholattices (3). Since Putnam wishes to reinstate a realist interpretation of quantum mechanics, we ask how quantum logic can be a logic of realism. We show that it certainly cannot be a logic of bivalence realism (i.e., of truth and falsity), although it is consistent with some form of ontological realism (4). Finally, we show that while a reasonable explication of the idealized notion of test yields interesting mathematical structure, it by no means yields the rich ortholattice structure which Putnam (following Finkelstein) seeks
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Alexandru Baltag & Sonja Smets (2011). Quantum Logic as a Dynamic Logic. Synthese 179 (2):285 - 306.
Similar books and articles
R. I. G. Hughes (1980). Quantum Logic and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:55 - 67.
Patrick Suppes (1966). The Probabilistic Argument for a Non-Classical Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):14-21.
Peter Gibbins (1987). Particles and Paradoxes: The Limits of Quantum Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Dickson (2001). Quantum Logic is Alive ∧ (It is True ∨ It is False). Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S274 - S287.
Michael R. Gardner (1971). Is Quantum Logic Really Logic? Philosophy of Science 38 (4):508-529.
J. L. Bell (1986). A New Approach to Quantum Logic. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (1):83-99.
James H. McGrath (1978). Only If Quanta Had Logic. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:268 - 275.
Allen Stairs (1983). Quantum Logic, Realism, and Value Definiteness. Philosophy of Science 50 (4):578-602.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads208 ( #11,876 of 1,789,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)87 ( #8,689 of 1,789,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?