Putnam and constructibility
Erkenntnis 62 (3):395--409 (2005)
| Abstract | I discuss and try to evaluate the argument about constructible sets made by Putnam in ‘ ”Models and Reality”, and some of the counterarguments directed against it in the literature. I shall conclude that Putnam’s argument, while correct in substance, nevertheless has no direct bearing on the philosophical question of unintended models of set theory | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCharles E. Cardwell (1972). A Note on Putnam and the Transitivity of the Real. Philosophical Studies 23 (6):414 - 417.
Hilary Putnam (1980). Models and Reality. Journal of Symbolic Logic 45 (3):464-482.
Panu Raatikainen (2001). Putnam, Languages and Worlds. Dialectica 55 (2):167–174.
Timothy Bays (2008). Two Arguments Against Realism. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):193–213.
Jürgen Dümont (1999). Putnam's Model-Theoretic Argument(S). A Detailed Reconstruction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 30 (2):341-364.
Michael Jacovides (2007). How Is Descartes' Argument Against Scepticism Better Than Putnam's? Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):593 - 612.
Timothy Bays (2007). More on Putnam's Models: A Reply to Belloti. Erkenntnis 67 (1):119--35.
Tim Button (2011). The Metamathematics of Putnam's Model-Theoretic Arguments. Erkenntnis 74 (3):321-349.
Michael Levin (1997). Putnam on Reference and Constructible Sets. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):55-67.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads22 ( #57,056 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
