Graduate studies at Western
Inquiry 30 (September):215-25 (1987)
|Abstract||The paper argues that there are effectively only two tenable theories of the mind?brain relationship: ?epiphenomenalism? and ?radical dualism? (interactionism). So long as account is taken only of the conventional sciences, the odds are heavily stacked in favour of epiphenomenalism. However, once the findings of parapsychology are admitted to consideration, a very different situation obtains. It is here argued that parapsychology only makes sense within a dualist metaphysic|
|Keywords||Body Metaphysics Mind Parapsychology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Beloff (1962/1965). The Existence Of Mind. McGibbon & Kee.
K. Ramakrishna Rao (ed.) (2010). Yoga and Parapsychology: Empirical Research and Theoretical Essays. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
David Rousseau (2011). Near-Death Experiences and the Mind-Body Relationship: A Systems-Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Near-Death Studies 29 (3):399-435.
George Hoben Estabrooks (1961). The Future of the Human Mind. New York, Dutton.
Benny Shanon (2008). Mind-Body, Body-Mind: Two Distinct Problems. Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.
Stephen Palmquist, Kant’s Criticism of Swedenborg: Parapsychology and the Origin of the Copernican Hypothesis.
Mitchell G. Ash, Horst Gundlach & Thomas Sturm (2010). Irreducible Mind? On E. Kelly Et Al., Irreducible Mind: Toward a Psychology for the 21st Century. [REVIEW] American Journal of Psychology 123:246-250.
John Beloff (1976). Mind-Body Interactionism in Light of the Parapsychological Evidence. Theoria to Theory 10 (May):125-37.
Karlyn K. Campbell (1970). Body and Mind. Doubleday.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #39,328 of 740,279 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,802 of 740,279 )
How can I increase my downloads?