Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3):503 - 514 (2008)
|Abstract||The perception of behavior as a moral or conventional concern can be influenced by contextual variables, including status and power differences. We propose that social processes and in particular social role enactment through the exercise of power will psychologically motivate moralization. Punishing or rewarding others creates a moral dilemma that can be resolved by externalizing causation to incontrovertible moral rules. Legitimate power related to structure and position can carry moral weight but may not influence the power holder’s perceptions of rules and general norms of behavior. Social identity theory suggests moralization could be promoted by a concern for shared, defining values. However, the tendency to moralize another’s behavior can be injurious to shared identity. We explored white-collar employees’ perceptions of several categories of noxious or deviant workplace behaviors and regressed these perceptions on the tendency to use legitimate, referent, or reward and punish power; social identity; and the interaction of social identity and power, in particular legitimate power. Only the tendency to influence others through punishment or reward predicted moralization. Alternative causal explanations for the findings were addressed through the absence of any relationships between punishment and reward power and perceptions of deviant behaviors as wrong, upsetting, or requiring punishment. We discuss these results in the context of self and social processes, the social construction of morals and power, and the impact of managers’ behavior on group or organizational ethics|
|Keywords||power reward punishment legitimacy social identity morality ethics norms deviant behavior transgression|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas Pink (2009). Power and Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Explorations 12 (2):127 – 149.
Johan Galtung (1964). Balance of Power and the Problem of Perception. Inquiry 7 (1-4):277 – 294.
Catherine Villanueva Gardner (2004). Heaven-Appointed Educators of Mind: Catharine Beecher and the Moral Power of Women. Hypatia 19 (2):1-16.
Gerald G. Biesinger (1984). Corporate Power and Employee Relations. Journal of Business Ethics 3 (2):139 - 142.
David Nyberg (1981). Power Over Power: What Power Means in Ordinary Life, How It is Related to Acting Freely, and What It Can Contribute to a Renovated Ethics of Education. Cornell University Press.
Judith Butler (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford University Press.
Christian Arnsperger, Probing the “Moralization of Capitalism” Problem: Democratic Experimentalism and the Co-Evolution of Norms.
Marion Fortin & Martin R. Fellenz (2008). Hypocrisies of Fairness: Towards a More Reflexive Ethical Base in Organizational Justice Research and Practice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 78 (3):415 - 433.
Mark S. Mizruchi (1990). Cohesion, Structural Equivalence, and Similarity of Behavior: An Approach to the Study of Corporate Political Power. Sociological Theory 8 (1):16-32.
Mark Haugaard (2010). Power and Social Criticism: Reflections on Power, Domination and Legitimacy. Critical Horizons 11 (1):51-74.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,523 of 739,140 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,140 )
How can I increase my downloads?