Studia Logica 51 (3-4):463 - 484 (1992)
|Abstract||The conditional,if an agent did something, then the agent could have done otherwise, is analyzed usingstit theory, which is a logic of seeing to it that based on agents making choices in the context of branching time. The truth of the conditional is found to be a subtle matter that depends on how it is interpreted (e.g., on what otherwise refers to, and on the difference between could and might) and also on whether or not there are busy choosers that can make infinitely many choices in a finite span of time|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ming Xu (1995). On the Basic Logic of STIT with a Single Agent. Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):459-483.
Michael S. Brady (2004). Against Agent-Based Virtue Ethics. Philosophical Papers 33 (1):1-10.
Nuel Belnap (1991). Before Refraining: Concepts for Agency. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 34 (2):137 - 169.
Douglas W. Portmore (2001). McNaughton and Rawling on the Agent-Relative/Agent-Neutral Distinction. Utilitas 13 (03):350-356.
Richard Bradley (1999). Conditional Desirability. Theory and Decision 47 (1):23-55.
Susanne Bobzien (2006). Moral Responsibility and Moral Development in Epicurus’ Philosophy. In B. Reis & S. Haffmans (eds.), The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics. CUP.
John F. Horty (1996). Agency and Obligation. Synthese 108 (2):269 - 307.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #81,690 of 722,741 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,741 )
How can I increase my downloads?