Graduate studies at Western
Studia Logica 80 (1):1 - 28 (2005)
|Abstract||“Flat pre-semantics” lets each parameter of truth (etc.) be considered sepa-rately and equally, and without worrying about grammatical complications. This allows one to become a little clearer on a variety of philosophical-logical points, such as the use fulness of Carnapian tolerance and the deep relativity of truth. A more definite result of thinking in terms of flat pre-semantics lies in the articulation of some instructive ways of categorizing operations on meanings in purely logical terms in relation to various parame- ters of truth (etc.); namely, closing vs. leaving open, local vs. translocal, and anchored vs. unanchored. Basic relations among these categories are established|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gregory Lavers (2008). Carnap, Formalism, and Informal Rigour. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):4-24.
Daniel Halliday (2007). Contextualism, Comparatives and Gradability. Philosophical Studies 132 (2):381 - 393.
Gregory Lavers (2004). Carnap, Semantics and Ontology. Erkenntnis 60 (3):295-316.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1987). Do We Need Models? Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (3):414-422.
Michael P. Lynch (2002). The Truth in Contextual Semantics. Grazer Philosophische Studien 63 (1):173-195.
Jaakko Hintikka (ed.) (1975). Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives. D. Reidel Pub. Co..
Charles Sayward (1975). Pragmatics and Indexicality. Pragmatics Microfiche 1 (4):D5-D11.
Lloyd Humberstone (2000). An Intriguing Logic with Two Implicational Connectives. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (1):1-40.
Claire Horisk (2007). The Expressive Role of Truth in Truth-Conditional Semantics. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):535–557.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,394 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?