David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Papers 42 (2):151-173 (2013)
At a first glance, and even at a second one, it seems that if time is linear the threat of determinism is more severe than if time is branching, since in the latter case the future is open in a way it is not in the former one where, so to speak, there exists only one branch – one future. In this paper, I want to give a 'third glance' at this claim. I acknowledge that such a claim is intuitive (this is the first glance) and that it is also meaningfully and interestingly defended in recent literature where branching time is either said to imply indeterminism or at least to be compatible with it. To try to make my third glance as precise and as fleshed out as possible, I shall first concentrate on what 'branching' is or could be, and I shall discuss various versions and interpretations of this view. I shall then (more quickly) turn my attention to what determinism is or could be, and I will distinguish three (well-known) kinds of it – focusing mainly on 'metaphysical determinism'. Having these tools in hand, I will then ask (and answer) the question whether branching time helps with avoiding determinism or not. As we shall see, it is incorrect to think that under the branching hypothesis the threat of determinism is any smaller – rather, I will argue that if one has reasons to think that determinism is true, branching will not help, and that the issue of branching versus linear time is then actually neutral with respect to the question whether determinism or indeterminism is true.
|Keywords||branching determinism indeterminism open future|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nuel D. Belnap (2001). Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Nuel Belnap & Mitchell Green (1994). Indeterminism and the Thin Red Line. Philosophical Perspectives 8:365 - 388.
Jiri Benovsky (2005). Branching Versus Divergent Possible Worlds. Kriterion 19 (1):12-20.
Phillip Bricker (2001). Island Universes and the Analysis of Modality. In G. Preyer & F. Siebelt (eds.), Reality and Humean Supervenience: Essays on the Philosophy of David Lewis. Rowman and Littlefield.
B. DeWitt & N. Graham (eds.) (1973). The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton UP.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nuel Belnap (2012). Newtonian Determinism to Branching Space-Times Indeterminism in Two Moves. Synthese 188 (1):5-21.
Matt Farr (2012). On A- and B-Theoretic Elements of Branching Spacetimes. Synthese 188 (1):85-116.
Ned Markosian (forthcoming). The Truth About the Past and the Future. In Fabrice Correia & Andrea Iacona (eds.), Around the Tree: Semantic and Metaphysical Issues Concerning Branching Time and the Open Future. Springer.
Thomas Müller (2012). Branching in the Landscape of Possibilities. Synthese 188 (1):41-65.
T. Placek (2012). Indeterminism is a Modal Notion: Branching Spacetimes and Earman's Pruning. [REVIEW] Synthese 187 (2):441-469.
Manolo Martínez (2011). Travelling in Branching Time. Disputatio 4 (31):59-75.
Huiyuhl Yi (2010). Non-Branching Clause. Metaphysica 11 (2):191-210.
Alastair Wilson (2012). Everettian Quantum Mechanics Without Branching Time. Synthese 188 (1):67-84.
ElŻbieta Hajnicz (1999). Some Considerations on Branching Areas of Time. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (1):17-43.
Added to index2012-05-18
Total downloads42 ( #49,949 of 1,693,213 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #15,992 of 1,693,213 )
How can I increase my downloads?